Insight Analytics & advertising
Not signed in

domain_click

Not enough data

In plain English

This campaign brought 19 visits from 16 people. That's down 10% on the previous period. Engagement was well below the site average: 52.6% against 61.4%, with visits lasting only 42s. That usually means the landing page isn't delivering what the ad promised, or the targeting is too broad. It produced 1.00 conversions (5.3% of visits). Traffic is too low to draw firm conclusions — treat these figures as indicative only.

The numbers

Each figure is compared with the same campaign over the previous equivalent period (2026-06-03 – 2026-07-01), so you can see direction, not just size.

Visits
19
▼ 10% vs previous period
People
16
▼ 16% vs previous period
Engaged
52.6%
▼ 35% vs previous period
Average time
42s
▼ 83% vs previous period
Conversions from this campaign 1.00
Share of visits that converted 5.3%

How it compares to the rest of the site

The site average is every visit from every source. A campaign performing below it is bringing worse-quality traffic than you'd get anyway.

MeasureThis campaign Site averageDifference
Engaged visits 52.6% 61.4% ▼ 14%
Average time 42s 3m 46s ▼ 81%
Pages per visit 2.16 2.13 ▲ 1%

Visits day by day

Useful for spotting when the campaign actually ran, and whether traffic held up or dropped off after launch.

Where people landed

The first page each visit hit. If engagement is poor here, the landing page is the first thing to look at.

Landing pages

2 rows
Landing page Visits Engaged Share
/ 1566.7% 78.9%
(not set) 40.0% 21.1%
Total 1952.6%

Pages they went on to view

What people looked at after arriving. A short list means they didn't explore.

15 rows
Page Pages viewed Visits Share
/ 1517 42.9%
/deposits/ 33 8.6%
/deposits/personal/ 32 8.6%
/lending/mortgages/ 32 8.6%
/about-utb/ 11 2.9%
/about-utb/regulatory-information/modern-slavery/ 11 2.9%
/accessibility/ 11 2.9%
/case-studies/second-charge-application-to-offer-in-24-hours-2/ 11 2.9%
/contact-centre/ 12 2.9%
/deposit-solutions-for-individuals/ 11 2.9%
/deposits/deposit-solutions/ 11 2.9%
/deposits/isa-savings-accounts/ 11 2.9%
/deposits/trust-bank-accounts/ 11 2.9%
/email-confidentiality/ 11 2.9%
/gender-pay-2025/ 11 2.9%
Total 4119

Devices

If one device type engages far worse than another, that's usually a layout problem.

2 rows
Device Visits Engaged Share
desktop 1136.4% 57.9%
mobile 875.0% 42.1%
Total 1952.6%